(Source)She is sceptical of the Government's focus on medals to determine where funding goes, and despairs when newspapers profile 12-15-year-old athletes as medal hopes for 2012. 'It's the people who have already done one Olympics who are much more likely to win a medal. In athletics most people peak in their late twenties.'
Jon wrote:It's an interesting topic. Has Britain become too obsessed with the 2012 Olympics? Goldie Sayers thinks so:(Source)She is sceptical of the Government's focus on medals to determine where funding goes, and despairs when newspapers profile 12-15-year-old athletes as medal hopes for 2012. 'It's the people who have already done one Olympics who are much more likely to win a medal. In athletics most people peak in their late twenties.'
What do others think? Do you like hearing about potential stars of the 2012 Olympics, or do you feel that it has now become repetitive, predictable and boring, and that we probably already know all of the athletes who will be representing Britain in 2012?
All fair comments, but it doesn't quite answer the question I posed. I'm more interested to know whether you're tired with hearing about potential 2012 stars and/or other 2012 Olympic hype?james montgomery wrote:The way things are going here in the UK I doubt we will have more than 30% of events with qualified athletes from GB and more of the same in 2012. As for medals. Maybe 2 in Bejing and with huge luck perhaps 4 in London. Am I a pesimist? Actually that's an optimistic view.
By the way for all those who go on about the medal count and our ranking in Athens. The medal count is not going to be assessed in future on gold weighting. e.g., a country with 1 gold and nothing else beats all other countries with no matter how many silver and bronzes. In future I believe the medals will be weighted 10, 6. 4 and the total will determine the medals tables position. It was quite unrealistic before.
Jon wrote:All fair comments, but it doesn't quite answer the question I posed. I'm more interested to know whether you're tired with hearing about potential 2012 stars and/or other 2012 Olympic hype?james montgomery wrote:The way things are going here in the UK I doubt we will have more than 30% of events with qualified athletes from GB and more of the same in 2012. As for medals. Maybe 2 in Bejing and with huge luck perhaps 4 in London. Am I a pesimist? Actually that's an optimistic view.
By the way for all those who go on about the medal count and our ranking in Athens. The medal count is not going to be assessed in future on gold weighting. e.g., a country with 1 gold and nothing else beats all other countries with no matter how many silver and bronzes. In future I believe the medals will be weighted 10, 6. 4 and the total will determine the medals tables position. It was quite unrealistic before.
james montgomery wrote:
By the way for all those who go on about the medal count and our ranking in Athens. The medal count is not going to be assessed in future on gold weighting. e.g., a country with 1 gold and nothing else beats all other countries with no matter how many silver and bronzes. In future I believe the medals will be weighted 10, 6. 4 and the total will determine the medals tables position. It was quite unrealistic before.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests