I must admit, I don't know much about the British club system, and I would love to get feedback on this. However, I can describe the Jamaican system, and how it's changed over recent years....
In the past, athletes would come to prominence and then gain an athletics scholarship to the US, which would be their ticket out of poverty, or the like. The US college would then provide all the support services, plus an education. But there were drawbacks too - the college was mainly interested in the athlete's contribution to the NCAA, and not focussed on summer Games. Also, once the student career was over, the athlete was out in the cold. Hence, why quite a few Jamaican athletes were out of form when the summer Games came around.
Then, along came MVP, and then Track Racers. Now, a rural athlete from Trelawny, for example, shows promise in his junior career. He attracts the attention of MVP, where the Francis brothers 'audition' him. Stephen is his coach, and what Stephen says goes. Paul signs a deal with the athlete to become his manager, for a cut, of course. MVP is attached to the University of Technology, in the leafy, quiet Kingston suburb of Mona, where I grew up.
Hence, why Jamaica's performances have improved in recent times. Surely, it's better for young athletes to follow this route. How can they improve if they have to worry about how they're going to fund their support services? It seems counter-productive to be providing these services for the successful athletes, such as Ennis, Farah, Greene, etc., while not providing them for upcoming athletes, and those who're going through a rough patch.
Am I misreading the club situation? Please put me right if I'm wrong....
