BigGut wrote:The solicitor has not mentioned contamination due to anything other than not following proceedure and so this paper IS completely irrlevant to this case.
I don't care what the paer says. What do you explictly want to happen.
What does means it has to be part of the evaluation mean? Does it mean letting people off or disregarding the possible contamination and banning them? It cannot be one rule for one person and one for another, are you saying contamination means letting people off or not?
Clearly contamination lets people of.
Individual case management.Same rules but applied individually to each case with such as mens rea taken into accouint for the punishment.
Wonderful you dont care what a WADA funded peer reviewed paper has to say.Condemed from your own mouth.Thank you.