Sotomayor wrote:At the end of the day it is banned, therefore performance enhancing. So I wouldn't be defending him if I were you.
Sotomayor wrote:At the end of the day it is banned, therefore performance enhancing. So I wouldn't be defending him if I were you.
Flumpy wrote:Sotomayor wrote:At the end of the day it is banned, therefore performance enhancing. So I wouldn't be defending him if I were you.
Oh the irony of your name
mump boy wrote:Do you think it helpful to place someone who got banned for cafeine (no longer on the banned list i believe) in the same category as Ben Johnson ?
Sotomayor wrote:mump boy wrote:Do you think it helpful to place someone who got banned for cafeine (no longer on the banned list i believe) in the same category as Ben Johnson ?
Didn't Ben Johnson claim someone put something in his drink when waiting to get tested in Seoul......... we have heard it all before.
Flumpy wrote:WAHOO!!! More on the way
SteveK26 wrote:Why?
jjimbojames wrote:Just seen this on Ato's twitter, suggesting MR's positive is one of the positive tests (and he said it after Mullings' test was announced):
AtoBoldon Ato Boldon
Yes that's one of the ones I referred to a few days ago. RT @nzaccardi: Reuters reporting Mike Rodgers tests positive for a stimulnt
17 hours ago
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest