To have those two twerps wittering on about nothing whilst field events and most of a Womens 3000m passed by completely ignored in the background was a crime against sport.
jeremy1 wrote:So it is possible for non Africans to run sub 8.10, but our steeplechasers are so way off even 8.15..
Laps wrote:My Mute button is wearing out.
To have those two twerps wittering on about nothing whilst field events and most of a Womens 3000m passed by completely ignored in the background was a crime against sport.
AEW wrote:Have been driven to emailing the BBC sports editors about the level to which their athletics coverage has sunk. There is something far wrong when my heart sinks to hear that the coverage is on mainstream TV rather than the red button.
Suspect they won't care having lost athletics coverage to Channel 4 who showed huge improvements from one championship to the next.
greenie1982 wrote:My understanding is during the Olympics that you will just be able to stream it live - if I have got that right? Much prefer that then replays
AEW wrote:Suspect they won't care having lost athletics coverage to Channel 4 who showed huge improvements from one championship to the next.
trickstat wrote:jeremy1 wrote:So it is possible for non Africans to run sub 8.10, but our steeplechasers are so way off even 8.15..
Yes I remember Mark Rowland. To be honest, if we want to see a Brit break 8.15, I think some of our better 1500 and/or 5000 runners will have to have a good go at the event.
2012girl wrote:AEW wrote:Suspect they won't care having lost athletics coverage to Channel 4 who showed huge improvements from one championship to the next.
You're right about them taking no notice but C4 only have the right to next years world champs then then the BBC have them back again and they've also won the rights for the olympics until 2020.
Colin gets worse and worse, standing there grinning and nodding like a halfwit. He's never been off the TV since he retired so you'd think he'd be used to being in front of a camera but a more inept pundit I've yet to see. It's cringeworthy listening to him blithering on with all this 'indeed' and 'him/herself' nonsense.
SteveK26 wrote:To be fair to Jackson and Edwards, they are not the producers. They have to talk and analyse on cue; someone else is making decisions about the pictures and coverage you are receiving.
Crams job is much easier, ie he can throw in astute observations as they come to him, (as opposed to someone whispering ''say something clever'' in his ear.
Kermit wrote:SteveK26 wrote:To be fair to Jackson and Edwards, they are not the producers. They have to talk and analyse on cue; someone else is making decisions about the pictures and coverage you are receiving.
Crams job is much easier, ie he can throw in astute observations as they come to him, (as opposed to someone whispering ''say something clever'' in his ear.
There is no need whatsoever for the BBC to be spending money on sending Mork and Mindy or anyone else to these events as the IAAF feed is far superior. By doing so they actually miss events because they are too busy either chatting to each other or trying to get needless interviews or showing needless tapes of interviews.
We have all witnessed the IAAF feed in full effect and if you are like me it leaves you exhilarated and sometimes breathless as the action is non stop.
SteveK26 wrote:Rooney is disappointing at the moment, after such a promising start to the season. He'll need to find some form from somewhere if he wants to make the final...which looks unlikely.
Osagie is so very consistent at the moment, I feel he may go sub 1-44 this season.
boysen wrote:Presumably the BBC have some sort of formula for calculating how many watch Friday night track. If it as as few as is suggested then it will come off if not then they surely are considering how to present it to attract more viewers?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], iain and 7 guests