by usedtoit33 » Sun Jul 01, 2012 3:42 am
Reading CVC's comments on the BBC are interesting.
Yes, it's a shame no team is representing us, but I'm not entirely sure what people would do? Three of our top 4 are injured/not fully fit/taking part - Oyepitan, Williams, Kwakye, Onuora are our best sprinters. All of them are bona fide 11.1/11.2/sub 23 sprinters. Normally a team of that quality would be fine to make the final.
We didn't send our best team and unluckily they got DQ'd. This happens.
They fluffed and were complacent in Barcelona, got the hairdryer treatment from CVC and were subsequently dropped from funding. Obviously we haven't heard anything from the sprinters' side exept for Oyepitan's unwillingness to be involved for whatever reason.
The failure is systemic and lies at everyone's doors. The best coaching in the world can't deal with all injuries, can't force perfect baton changes or stop athletes from running on the line. Even the GDR dropped the baton on occasion. Whatever's causing injuries - training load, bad luck, poor coaching, poor technique, poor conditioning - is something athletes and their coaches have to address.
Where UKA falls down is for not organising relay races for the team this year in a domestic meeting - even if at the end of the trials. I do find it ironic that those that criticised UKA for concentrating funding on relays in order to gain 'cheap medals', and have criticised our female sprinters, are now blaming them for not investing in a relay team.
I've never met CVC, but I get the impression that if you want to impress him, you have to prove you're good enough and have the right attitude - in his eyes at least.