Sponsored post: The OPAP Limassol Marathon GSO ticks all the boxes for international visitors looking for a complete race experience combined with a superb weekend away
UK Athletics launches ‘Clean Athletics’ brandJanuary 11, 2017
National governing body’s chairman Ed Warner says there is concern that “the pace of change remains too slow”
A year on from its publication of ‘A Manifesto for Clean Athletics‘, UK Athletics (UKA) has launched its own ‘Clean Athletics’ brand, which the national governing body says has the aim of “reinforcing UK Athletics’ commitment to athletes competing free from performance-enhancing drugs”.
Last year’s manifesto called for a wide-ranging debate about measures that could be introduced to achieve a new era of clean athletics.
A total of 14 proposals were included in that manifesto, and on Wednesday the UKA released a number of updates, including:
» Anti-doping agencies should be renamed Clean Sport, or their equivalent in local language – for example Clean Sport UK – to emphasise the ultimate purpose of their activities.
Update: UKA has launched its own ‘Clean Athletics’ brand, which will replace the former Anti-Doping department.
» UK Athletics will seek to enforce a lifetime ban against representing Great Britain for any athlete guilty of a serious anti-doping violation.
Update: UKA confirms that it has been operating its ‘Team Members Agreement’ for a year now, which states athletes contractually forfeit their right to further compete for British Athletics if found guilty of a serious doping offence.
» Bans should be extended to a minimum of eight years for serious doping offences to ensure that cheating athletes miss two Olympic or Paralympic cycles. Lifetime bans should also be applied in appropriate cases.
Update: The national governing body highlights that other federations have either announced or are currently working on their own system of ensuring lifetime bans.
» A call to the IAAF to investigate the implications of drawing a line under all pre-existing sport records – for example, by adjusting event rules – and commencing a new set of records based on performances in the new Clean Athletics era.
Update: European Athletics has announced a taskforce to look into the possible resetting of records and UKA advises that further debate has suggested the removal of all athlete records upon any serious doping offence.
» The IAAF should insist that all athletes competing in world championships have a valid blood/biological passport and have been subject to a predetermined number of in-competition and out-of-competition tests in the twelve months preceding the competition.
Update: As part of their re-instatement requirement, UKA highlights that the IAAF is now insisting Russian athletes demonstrate their cleanliness with a set number of approved tests, a requirement which may become a future basic level of compliance across the sport.
» A call to all companies who engage in sports sponsorship not to support any athlete found guilty of a serious doping offence as a matter of principle in support of Clean Athletics. In addition we call for the IAAF to ring-fence a percentage of each of its commercial sponsorships to be used toward the funding and support of Clean Athletics.
Update: The Department for Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) has recently announced a review of UK Anti-Doping (UKAD). “We hope that this will result in a substantial increase in its funding from government and recognition that it requires far more resource,” read a statement from UKA in part.
Clean Athletics has been created to replace UKA’s former ‘Anti-Doping’ department.
UKA chairman Ed Warner (pictured above) commented: “As we announced last year, the integrity of athletics was challenged as never before in 2015. However, 2016 saw a seismic change in the way athletics responded to doping in sport.
“The stances taken by both the IAAF for athletics and the IPC on behalf of all Paralympic sports could be seen as a turning point, but there is still much to do. Watching federations such as Athletics Ethiopia announce its own lifetime bans is another step in the right direction.”
He added: “Overall, we are concerned that the pace of change remains too slow, in spite of the Russian situation and the spotlight it shed on WADA and its relationship with the IOC last summer. There remains too much denial in too many quarters, but we will continue to work to make progress in the areas we can.
“Finally we are using this one year on moment to launch our own Clean Athletics brand and would urge other sports to follow suit to remain focused on what they want to achieve.”